StartPage Protects Your Privacy!

Why should you worry?

Keep Your Searches Private
In , EPIC, along with other privacy groups, wrote a letter to Google about the company's decision to combine user data among 12 Google services. You can use encrypted Secure Socket Layer SSL connections to carry out your search stopping your ISP from snooping on you, this is of vital importance if you are using a public computer in an internet cafe, library or at work where the network administrator can easily spy on your search terms. Do you know some more interesting but good privacy-oriented alternative search engines to Google? Everyone, except people you have blocked, can search for you and click on your profile, but what they can see about you in search results depends on what's shared with them. EPIC recently filed a complaint asking the FTC to investigate Google's use of a proprietary, secret algorithm Google claims can "de-identify" consumers while tracking their purchases. Malware and javascript filtering is included to remove any dangerous sites you might visit. Jill on 29 February, at

Share your voice

List of privacy search engines for anonymous Internet search

DuckDuckGo is the most well-established privacy-focused search engine, and enjoys more brand recognition than the other search engines on this list. The engine uses sources to find results, but most hits are pulled from Yahoo, Bing, and Yandex. Google results are not included. DuckDuckGo is one website that is trying to offer such an alternative. Here are 25 useful DuckDuckGo bangs to get you started! Read More if you would like to learn more.

StartPage also provides a proxy feature. The only negative is that pages will load more slowly if you use it. As such, you can dig down into the code and make sure the company is delivering on its privacy promises.

And because SearX is open source, you can also set up and run your own instance of it. Doing so gives you a foolproof guarantee that your data is not being logged. Functionally, SearX is a metasearch engine, meaning it aggregates data from a number of other search engines then provides you with the best mix available. Results from several of the other search engines on this list—including DuckDuckGo, Qwant, and StartPage—are available.

You can customize the engines that SearX uses to find results in the Preferences menu. Qwant is recommended by PrivacyTools. Formerly known as Hulbee, Swisscows makes the list thanks to its focus on family-friendly private searches. Results with adult themes are excluded from the results entirely, and there are no settings to override that behavior.

Swisscows does not store any personal data, IP addresses, search queries, or other identifiers. The Commission has previously settled charges with Apple and sued Amazon for charging parents for their kids unauthorized in-app purchases. For more information, see EPIC: A federal judge reviewing a proposed class action settlement in a case concerning Google's disclosure of user data to third parties has said "it doesn't pass the smell test.

The consumer privacy organization wrote to the judge when the settlement was first proposed and again last week , before the final fairness hearing. The groups cited the skepticism expressed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts about a similar privacy settlement.

EPIC, joined by leading consumer protection organizations, has asked a federal judge to reject a proposed class action settlement in In re Google Referrer Header Litigation. The settlement requires no substantial change in Google's business practices and provides no benefit to class members. EPIC wrote to the same judge last year when the settlement was first proposed, urging him not to approve. And the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court has expressed deep skepticism about settlements that provide no benefits to class members.

The judge in the Google care will rule on the settlement August The agency stated that it "systematically monitors compliance" with its consumer protection orders and that it "takes alleged violation[s] of an order seriously," but that it cannot publicly disclose details of its investigations until a formal complaint is issued.

In , Google was sued for sharing user web browsing information with advertisers. Under the proposed settlement agreement , Google will distribute several million dollars to a handful of organizations, many of which already have ties to the company. EPIC and other privacy organizations urged the Commission to formally object because the proposed agreement "confers no monetary relief to class members, compels no change in Google's behavior, and misallocates the cy pres distribution.

Facebook , an unfair class action settlement in the Ninth Circuit. For more information see EPIC: EPIC, along with a group of consumer privacy organizations, has asked the Federal Trade Commission to object to an unfair class action settlement in California federal court. EPIC and other privacy organizations have argued that the proposed agreement "confers no monetary relief to class members, compels no change in Google's behavior, and misallocates the cy pres distribution" to organizations that are "not aligned with the interests of class members and do not further the purpose of the litigation.

The agency filed a similar objection in Fraley v. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that police conducted an unconstitutional search when they used an IP address to obtain subscriber information from an Internet Service Provider without legal authorization. In its analysis, the Court described information privacy as "control over, access to and use of information.

A federal judge in California has approved a settlement agreement in a lawsuit against Google that will allow the company to continue to sell data about users' browsing history to advertisers. EPIC and several other consumer privacy organizations objected to the settlement , stating that it requires no change in Google's business practices and provides no benefit to those on whose behalf the case was brought.

EPIC and the groups also recommended that the court adopt an objective basis for distributing cy pres funds, noting that the awards are often made for the benefit of the lawyers settling the case and not the class members.

Class action settlements have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, with courts increasingly concerned about collusion between attorneys and faux settlements that do not reflect the purpose of the initial lawsuit.

In a case that reached the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts said that courts will need to look more closely at these settlements to determine whether there are fair, whether organizations designated to receive funds reflect the interests of class members, and also the obligation of judges to carefully review these proposals. EPIC, joined by several leading privacy and consumer protection organizations, submitted a letter to the Northern District of California regarding a proposed settlement in a class-action lawsuit against Google.

The settlement was proposed by class action lawyers on behalf of Google users in a case concerning the unlawful disclosure of search terms by Google to third parties. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, Google would be allowed to continue to disclose user search terms to third parties. The letter explains that the proposed settlement "provides no benefit to Class members" because it does not require Google to change its business practices.

Under Ninth Circuit precedent, cy pres funds must be used to advance the interests of the class members. EPIC previously highlighted the dangers of improper cy pres distributions in settlements. Facebook , and EPIC: The Internet Society has announced the world launch of IPv6 , which will dramatically expand the number of Internet addresses.

IPv6 creates fixed IP addresses, allowing routine tracking of Internet-connected devices, such as laptops, cellphones, and soon many consumer appliances. This will make it easier for law enforcement agencies and advertisers to track users of Internet-based services. A Privacy Extension allows the use of IPv6 without persistent identifiers, though it is not clear how widely it will be be adopted. In , EPIC testified before the European Parliament on IP addresses and privacy, and said that companies that use IPv6 linked to identifiable users should be subject to data privacy requirements.

The EU classifies IP addresses as personal information. A Pew study found that users of search engines were pleased with the quality of search results but opposed targeted advertising and search results, and were generally anxious about the collection of personal information by search engines. Specifically, 73 percent of those surveyed were opposed to search engines tracking their searches, and 68 percent opposed behavioral advertising.

Recently, Google began combining user data gathered from more than sixty Google products and services—including Google search--to create a single, comprehensive profile for each user.

Eight members of Congress wrote to Google asking the company to explain the "steps [that] are being taken to ensure the protection of consumers' privacy rights. The members' letter includes 11 specific questions ranging from the ways in which Google collects information to the specific consequences for Android phone users. In , EPIC, along with other privacy groups, wrote a letter to Google about the company's decision to combine user data among 12 Google services. The groups warned that the practical effect would be to reduce privacy protection for users of Google services.

International watchdog Privacy International has announced the launch of a new website for bringing transparency to "technical mysteries" behind controversial systems. Cracking the Black Box identifies key questions regarding mysterious technologies and asks experts, whistleblowers, and other concerned parties to "help crack the box" by anonymously contributing ideas and input.

The organization responsible for the technology in question is then invited to provide an official response.

You can disable the data collection entirely by enabling the SuperPrivacy setting. Blekko even lets you disable ads entirely. To surf anonymously everywhere — at the cost of slower browsing speed — try the Tor Browser Bundle.

The Best Tech Newsletter Anywhere. Join , subscribers and get a daily digest of news, comics, trivia, reviews, and more. Windows Mac iPhone Android.

What Kinds of Data Are Google and Bing Collecting?

Leave a Reply

Google, Bing, Yahoo – all the major search engines track your search history and build profiles on you, serving different results based on your search history. Try one of these alternative search engines if you’re tired of being tracked. DuckDuckGo is “The Search Engine that Vows Not to Track You”. Gabriel Weinberg, the CEO and founder of DuckDuckGo, has stated that “if the FBI comes to us, we have nothing to tie back to you.” It is a US-based company and is the most popular and high-profile of the privacy search engines. The Internet privacy company that empowers you to seamlessly take control of your personal information online, without any tradeoffs. About DuckDuckGo Duck it! The search engine that doesn't track you.